Error there is more than one entry for Water System Areas.
(Geography, IRWMP, System Category, MHI2010, and DAC calculation are incorrect in database.)
Community: GREENFIELD COUNTY WD
County: Kern
Sys. Category:
Agency Name: GREENFIELD COUNTY WD
Ownership: Public (state, federal, local)
Ownership Type: City, County, State owned
Population: 8500
Connections: 2660
2010 MHI: 0,000
SDAC or DAC: SDAC
DAC Classification Source: Calculated
IRWMP:
Geography:
Location: Bakersfield
Contact Title: General Manager
Contact: Mel Johnson
Phone:
Alt. Contact:
Phone:
H2O Sys. Num.: 1510024
Water Source: GW
Active Wells Count: 5
Wells Issues?: XXXXX
Issues: Greenfield County Water District (GCWD), established in 1955 by the Kern County Board of Supervisor, is a domestic water purveyor that serves a small rural community in southeast Bakersfield. GCWD receives 100% of their water supply from groundwater wells
Potential Solutions:
| Water quality sample results for selected constituents. Values shown for water samples collected 2004-2014. | |||||||||||||
| Raw Water | Delivered Water | Raw Water | Delivered Water | ||||||||||
| Max. | Ave. | Count | Max. | Ave. | Count | Max. | Ave. | Count | Max. | Ave. | Count | ||
| Arsenic (10 ug/L): | 14.00 | 9.82 | 54 | 14.00 | 9.82 | 54 | Flouride (2 mg/L): | 0.37 | 0.20 | 13 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 13 |
| DBCP (0.2 ug/L): | 0.50 | 0.16 | 13 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 13 | Perchlorate (6 ug/L): | 4.00 | 2.77 | 13 | 4.00 | 2.77 | 13 |
| Nitrate as NO3 (45 mg/L): | 34.00 | 18.18 | 48 | 34.00 | 18.18 | 48 | TCE (5 ug/L): | 0.50 | 0.50 | 13 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 13 |
| PCB (0.5ug/L): | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2 | THMs (80 ug/L): | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2 |
| Uranium (20 pC/L): | 16.50 | 10.25 | 2 | 16.50 | 10.25 | 2 | |||||||
WW Sys. Num.:
Treatment: XXXXX
Design Flow (MGD):
Total Enforcement Actns:
Cat.1 Viol:
Cat. 2 Viol:
Septic Probs?: XXXXX
Sewer Issues:
Potential Solutions: An analysis of two options would allow GCWD to evaluate these three wells that have exceeded the MCL in arsenic and remediate GCWD problem. Initially zone testing would be requested to determine where good quality water is found. If good water quality is found, you would zone blocked off the bad areas. This would keep out the bad water in the well. If it is determined there are not any areas were there is good water, then it would be recommend to build a new well possibly with the existing well site or perhaps new well site. A new well would be favorable over arsenic treatment due to the high cost and long-tern maintenance and operation of an arsenic treatment. These options would have to be analyzed in order to determine the best method. Through this process, opportunities will be sought after to provide GCWD with short-term answers while determining options that will save the GCWD money while looking to address the long term requirements.
Treatment Comm: XXXXX
SelfHelp Comments: